Talk:Editor:Wanted Pages: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Verisimilar (talk | contribs) m (Current Token) |
Verisimilar (talk | contribs) m (→Introduction to Lighting and Vision: new section) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
With a whopping 73 links(Current Token 37 / Token:Current Token 36), it seems obvious we could clean up a lot of our 'red' links by creating this page. In the meantime though, I'm going to go through the [[Special:WantedPages]] and clean up red links that either point to the same conceptual target in different ways, or point to a target that exists already under a different name. [[User:Verisimilar|zEal]] 21:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC) | With a whopping 73 links(Current Token 37 / Token:Current Token 36), it seems obvious we could clean up a lot of our 'red' links by creating this page. In the meantime though, I'm going to go through the [[Special:WantedPages]] and clean up red links that either point to the same conceptual target in different ways, or point to a target that exists already under a different name. [[User:Verisimilar|zEal]] 21:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Introduction to Lighting and Vision == | |||
This one is all the way at the bottom of the list, as it looks like a planned article that Rumble is going to write. As much as I like the title, would it be better to try to remain semantically correct(in the context of MapTool) and call it Introduction to Lights and Sights? [[User:Verisimilar|zEal]] 21:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:04, 4 April 2009
Current Token
With a whopping 73 links(Current Token 37 / Token:Current Token 36), it seems obvious we could clean up a lot of our 'red' links by creating this page. In the meantime though, I'm going to go through the Special:WantedPages and clean up red links that either point to the same conceptual target in different ways, or point to a target that exists already under a different name. zEal 21:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Introduction to Lighting and Vision
This one is all the way at the bottom of the list, as it looks like a planned article that Rumble is going to write. As much as I like the title, would it be better to try to remain semantically correct(in the context of MapTool) and call it Introduction to Lights and Sights? zEal 21:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)